![16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy 16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy](https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*huQFFOYkqWa2tmZZcP6FxQ.png)
![16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy 16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/57700225/mini_magick20190110-19625-15uhxgf.png)
They are not scientists and worthy of neither praise or credibility. They do not follow the scientific method. The scientific method demands that experiments be made to confirm the hypothesis.Īstronomers do not perform experiments. You claim that astronomers employ the scientific method, but you are embarassingly wrong. They cannot perform controlled experiments on the universe to come to the truth of the matter as earthly professions can. That's where astronomers are, trapped in ignorance and assumption. If I knew nothing of chemistry and only observed and interpreted I could come up with all sorts of assumptions to explain why water is wet, why cyanide kills, why oil doesn't mix with water, and why balloons float. Scientists in other professions are expected to perform controlled experiments to come to the truth of the matter, so why not astronomers?
![16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy 16-page pamphlet called zetetic astronomy](https://ekonurhuda.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/9e6c6-firmament-genesis_cosmology.jpg)
He does not do any experiments on the universe before publishing his works. Pick up any of Stephan Hawking's works and count the number of controlled experiments performed to confirm any of his theories, such as his hypothesis for the metric expansion of space. I'm saying that astronomers only observe and interpret.